Support for path-stretchpoint-x and path-stretchpoint-y attributes in EnhancedPathShape
Review Request #5978 - Created Nov. 26, 2010 and updated
Path-stretchpoint-x and path-stretchpoint-y are needed for example in round-rectangles to have the corners round after stretching, without it the corners would be eliptical. Bug 258267
It looks wellcode, but I don't know this shape so I havn't actually looked at what it does. Still I found a couple of style issues. Someone else please look at it, as I don't feel comfortable
Test document added
I would actually want to register a different opinion: I think that empty lines are underrated, and that they add to the clarity of the code by grouping a number of statements. In particular, I think this empty line is fine. I also don't remember anything about discouraging empty lines in the coding standards. Can you point me to where it says anything about it?